BGMI team and player rankings, computed from real results

Weighted rankings arrived on PUBG Mobile Pedia on 20 October 2026, and they replace the stage tables that used to sit on this page. The old page reprinted final orders and refused to blend them, because the stages did not share a scoring scale. This page now blends results across events, but only under a printed formula, inside fixed windows, and with inputs that already exist as records on this site.

Nothing in the sums below is imported from outside. Every placement, award and fragger list used here was already published on a PUBG Mobile Pedia tournament or player page before the ranking was computed, and the stage tables themselves still live on the event pages, including the BMSD 2026 and BGIS 2026 Grand Finals boards this page used to reprint.

Two windows close on 20 October 2026. The three month table counts finished events that ended on or after 20 July 2026, seven events in all. The six month table counts finished events that ended on or after 20 April 2026, sixteen events in all.

Placements earn fixed points from a team's best recorded finish in each event: 100 for first, 70 for second, 50 for third, 35 for fourth, 25 for fifth, 18 for sixth, 12 for seventh, 8 for eighth, 5 for ninth through twelfth, and 2 for thirteenth through sixteenth. Finishes are read from grand finals and overall standings tables, from prize distributions, and from the recorded winner and runner-up on each event page. A team with no recorded finish in an event scores nothing for that event.

Tier weights then scale every event: 1.0 for S-Tier, 0.7 for A-Tier, 0.45 for B-Tier and 0.25 for C-Tier, with an event that has no recorded tier treated as B-Tier. One D-Tier event, Espotz Pro League 2026, falls inside the six month window and is weighted at 0.25, the lowest rate the scale defines.

Players earn 30 points for a tournament MVP award, 15 for another named award such as Finals MVP, Best IGL or Grenadier, and 10 for appearing in a published top fragger list, each scaled by the same tier weight. An MVP recorded in more than one place on this site is counted once, not once per record.

Coverage sets the limits of the player table. A tournament MVP is recorded for fourteen of the sixteen events in the six month window, while player statistic lists are stored for only three of them, and most entries on those lists carry award tags rather than a pure fragger ranking. The player table is therefore an honours table with a fragger component, and it should be read that way.

Tied totals are separated first by the number of scoring events or honours, then alphabetically.

16score ranks teams inside a single event. Its BGMI coverage is built from live points tables for each stage, with team and player statistics such as finishes tracked per event and trending lists inside its app, and it publishes no formula that blends one event into another. This page starts from the same kind of published event tables, then does the one thing that model does not: it blends events under one printed formula, with the windows and weights stated above.

EsportStats builds its team and player rankings from deep post-match statistics, comparing form across tournaments instead of reading final placements alone, so match level numbers can move a rating even when a finals finish does not change. The player table here borrows only a slice of that idea, the 10 points for a recorded top fragger list appearance. The rest is placements and named awards, so a heavy fragger whose team keeps missing finals will sit lower here than a stats first model would place him.

Neither site's numbers are reused on this page, and neither method is copied. The approaches disagree by design: a single event table, a statistics driven rating, and this placement and honours blend will not always crown the same leader in the same window.